AI Prediction
Model hit rate 56.3%

How the model did: 43 of 70 right (61.4%) on 26 October 2026

Model review · Published 2026-10-27 · Updated 2026-10-27 11:40 UTC

70 settled matches, 43 correct picks, one real upset (a draw over F.C. København) and the honest numbers behind them.

70 of our predictions settled in the last day and the model landed 43 of them, a 61.4% hit rate for the day against a running 56% across 1707 settled picks since launch. A good day by three-way standards, where even the closing market sits near 53%.

Upset of the day: a draw 1-1 F.C. København

The model gave F.C. København 71.9% and the draw only 19%. Danish Superliga result: F.C. København 1-1 Odense Boldklub. A 19% outcome should happen about once in every 5 such matches, so the question is whether the inputs missed something, usually team news, rather than whether the probability was wrong.

Best call: Golden State Valkyries at 54.5%

Golden State Valkyries 64-55 Atlanta Dream in the WNBA. This was a genuinely close call that the model leaned the right way on, exactly the kind of edge that adds up over a season.

All results

MatchScorePickResult
Lilli Tagger v Venus Williamsnull-nullLilli Tagger (89.2%)Correct
Danka Kovinic v Noma Noha Akuguenull-nullNoma Noha Akugue (69.1%)Correct
Polina Kudermetova v Janice Tjennull-nullPolina Kudermetova (53.7%)Wrong
Tereza Valentova v Mia Pohankovanull-nullTereza Valentova (57.7%)Wrong
Naomi Osaka v Jasmine Paolininull-nullNaomi Osaka (68.2%)Correct
Antonia Ruzic v Claire Liunull-nullClaire Liu (51.2%)Correct
New Zealand v Indianull-nullIndia (72.1%)Correct
Leylah Fernandez v Himeno Sakatsumenull-nullLeylah Fernandez (77.6%)Correct
Dayana Yastremska v Katie Volynetsnull-nullKatie Volynets (58.3%)Wrong
Aliaksandra Sasnovich v Nikola Bartunkovanull-nullNikola Bartunkova (67.2%)Wrong
Sara Sorribes Tormo v Zeynep Sonmeznull-nullZeynep Sonmez (65.7%)Correct
Diane Parry v Cristina Bucsanull-nullDiane Parry (55.3%)Wrong
Yulia Putintseva v Maria Sakkarinull-nullMaria Sakkari (55.8%)Wrong
Simona Waltert v Jil Teichmannnull-nullJil Teichmann (57.2%)Correct
Anastasia Zakharova v Magda Linettenull-nullMagda Linette (51.9%)Correct
Kaitlin Quevedo v Sofia Keninnull-nullKaitlin Quevedo (68.5%)Correct
Ann Li v Ekaterina Alexandrovanull-nullAnn Li (52.6%)Wrong
Denver Nuggets v Golden State Warriors114-134Denver Nuggets (61.3%)Wrong
Maya Joint v Sorana Cirsteanull-nullSorana Cirstea (69.7%)Wrong
Edmonton Oilers v Detroit Red Wings3-4Edmonton Oilers (64.8%)Wrong
Independiente Santa Fe v Atlético Bucaramanga2-1Independiente Santa Fe (57%)Correct
Utah Jazz v Memphis Grizzlies105-110Utah Jazz (56.6%)Wrong
Houston Rockets v Atlanta Hawks120-110Houston Rockets (58.8%)Correct
Calgary Flames v Toronto Maple Leafs5-2Toronto Maple Leafs (62.8%)Wrong
Instituto (Córdoba) v Deportivo Riestra1-0Instituto (Córdoba) (43%)Correct
Philadelphia Eagles v Dallas Cowboys21-38Philadelphia Eagles (55.8%)Wrong
Golden State Valkyries v Atlanta Dream64-55Golden State Valkyries (54.5%)Correct
Milwaukee Bucks v Indiana Pacers110-102Milwaukee Bucks (61.1%)Correct
Oklahoma City Thunder v Phoenix Suns125-114Oklahoma City Thunder (61.4%)Correct
Tampa Bay Rays v Milwaukee Brewers1-10Tampa Bay Rays (50.6%)Wrong
Boston Celtics v Chicago Bulls134-99Boston Celtics (63.2%)Correct
Miami Heat v Dallas Mavericks109-113Miami Heat (61.7%)Wrong
Flamengo v Atlético-MG3-2Flamengo (72.5%)Correct
Jaguares de Córdoba v Llaneros FC1-0Llaneros FC (37.3%)Wrong
Charlotte Hornets v Washington Wizards110-103Charlotte Hornets (64.5%)Correct
Cleveland Cavaliers v Minnesota Timberwolves127-125Cleveland Cavaliers (58.1%)Correct
New York Rangers v Los Angeles Kings3-6New York Rangers (70.6%)Wrong
Coritiba v Grêmio0-1Coritiba (40.2%)Wrong
Unión (Santa Fe) v Estudiantes de La Plata3-1Estudiantes de La Plata (38.6%)Wrong
Universidad de Chile v Everton CD4-1Universidad de Chile (55.2%)Correct
Sevilla v Osasuna2-0Sevilla (48.5%)Correct
Walsall v Salford City2-4Salford City (54%)Correct
Dominic Stricker v Alexander Bubliknull-nullAlexander Bublik (80.9%)Correct
Boulogne v Stade de Reims1-1Stade de Reims (50.5%)Wrong
Montpellier v Red Star FC 932-1Montpellier (49.2%)Correct
Luisina Giovannini v Lucia Bronzettinull-nullLucia Bronzetti (60.8%)Wrong
Paris Saint-Germain v Lyon2-0Paris Saint-Germain (66.1%)Correct
FC Andorra v Burgos2-3FC Andorra (55.8%)Wrong
Luca Van Assche v Learner Tiennull-nullLearner Tien (72.4%)Correct
Santa Clara v Benfica1-2Benfica (72.1%)Correct
Galatasaray v Fenerbahce2-1Galatasaray (52%)Correct
F.C. København v Odense Boldklub1-1F.C. København (71.9%)Wrong
Luciano Darderi v Matteo Arnaldinull-nullLuciano Darderi (58.4%)Correct
Jakub Mensik v Lukas Neumayernull-nullJakub Mensik (83%)Correct
Arthur Fery v Jacob Fearnleynull-nullArthur Fery (55.3%)Correct
Lisa Zaar v Ayla Aksunull-nullAyla Aksu (75.4%)Correct
Victoria Bosio v Jazmin Ortenzinull-nullJazmin Ortenzi (57.8%)Correct
Besiktas v Istanbul Basaksehir2-0Besiktas (80%)Correct
Caykur Rizespor v Trabzonspor3-4Trabzonspor (60.8%)Correct
Fernanda Labrana v Gabriela Cenull-nullFernanda Labrana (51.9%)Wrong
Holger Rune v Quentin Halysnull-nullHolger Rune (52%)Correct
Tomas Machac v Alex de Minaurnull-nullAlex de Minaur (70.9%)Correct
Laura Samson v Alice Tubellonull-nullLaura Samson (71.8%)Wrong
Daniel Altmaier v Juan Manuel Cerundolonull-nullJuan Manuel Cerundolo (54%)Wrong
Matteo Berrettini v Tomas Martin Etcheverrynull-nullMatteo Berrettini (58.7%)Correct
Valentin Vacherot v Mariano Navonenull-nullValentin Vacherot (61.6%)Correct
Harriet Dart v Tatiana Prozorovanull-nullTatiana Prozorova (58.8%)Wrong
Paula Badosa v Wang Xiyunull-nullPaula Badosa (62.8%)Correct
Alexandra Eala v Mika Stojsavljevicnull-nullAlexandra Eala (91.5%)Correct
Shi Han v Alevtina Ibragimovanull-nullShi Han (58.3%)Correct

By competition

  • WTA Guangzhou Open: 8 of 11 correct
  • WTA Toray Pan Pacific Open Tennis: 3 of 9 correct
  • NBA: 6 of 9 correct
  • ATP Erste Bank Open: 6 of 6 correct
  • ATP Swiss Indoors Basel: 3 of 4 correct
  • WTA Curitiba Open: 1 of 4 correct
  • NHL: 0 of 3 correct
  • Super Lig: 3 of 3 correct
  • WTA Valle D'Aosta Ladies Open: 2 of 2 correct
  • Primera A: 1 of 2 correct
  • Liga Profesional: 1 of 2 correct
  • Brasileirao: 1 of 2 correct
  • Ligue 2: 1 of 2 correct

Where the track record stands

Across every settled prediction the model is at 56% (956 of 1707). The full breakdown by confidence band, with Brier score and log-loss, is on the track record page, and the methodology section there shows the same model scored against closing odds over a full season. Read more